How to Trust the Discernment You Already Have
A conductor’s lesson on letting go to lead better
“Discernment doesn’t come from gathering more. It comes from releasing what crowds the room. The signal is already there. The question is whether you’re quiet enough to hear it.”

I was twenty years old, sweating through my shirt on a rickety podium at the Canford Summer School of Music. Eighty pairs of eyes watched me flail. My baton carved desperate patterns in the air—cueing every entrance, controlling every phrase, practically conducting every note through sheer force of gesture.
That’s when George Hurst—one of the great conducting masters of the twentieth century—shouted from the wings:
“Let them play!”
The orchestra stopped. Violinists smirked. I remember the principal oboist raising an eyebrow. I stood there, baton frozen mid-air, wondering what I’d done wrong.
George’s soft-soled shoes echoed throughout the audienceless auditorium as he approached. He studied me with that particular mixture of exasperation and compassion that only great teachers master.
“Stephen,” he said quietly, but loud enough for everyone to hear. “They already know how to play. Let them do their job. You do yours.”
That landed like a thunderclap.
I was so busy managing that I’d forgotten to lead. So desperate to control every detail that I’d lost sight of the music itself. So afraid of letting go that I was suffocating the very thing I was trying to create.
What George taught me that day reaches far beyond the podium: clarity comes from knowing what to release, not what to grip harder.
Just about every leader I’ve worked with—whether in healthcare, education, or the arts—eventually hits the same wall. They’re drowning in input. Notifications multiply. Opinions accumulate. The signal they need gets buried under noise they never asked for.
Mental noise isn’t just distracting. It actively crowds out discernment. And without discernment, even good decisions feel exhausting.
The solution isn’t working harder or thinking faster. It’s learning to filter with intention. Three principles have shaped my own practice—and they apply whether you’re leading a team, managing a household, or simply trying to hear yourself think.
Principle 1: Distinguish Between Noise and Necessary Input
Not all information deserves equal weight. Yet we treat it as if it does.
Cal Newport, in Digital Minimalism, argues that the problem isn’t technology itself—it’s our failure to distinguish between what enriches our thinking and what merely occupies our attention.¹ The constant scroll, the ambient news cycle, the notifications that feel urgent but rarely matter—these don’t inform. They accumulate.
I’ve seen this pattern across every organization I’ve served. Leaders drown not because they lack capacity, but because they never learned to filter incoming demands. Every request feels equally valid in the moment. Every opinion seems worth considering. But that equality is an illusion.
Some input sharpens discernment. Some simply crowds the room.
The first principle isn’t about shutting everything out. It’s about recognizing that not everything knocking deserves to come in. Some voices clarify. Others just add volume.
If you can’t name the difference, you’ll exhaust yourself trying to listen to all of them.
Principle 2: Trust That Less Information Can Yield Clearer Judgment
This principle violates everything modern culture teaches about leadership.
We’re told that more data leads to better decisions. More perspectives yield richer insight. More input equals more informed thinking.
But research suggests otherwise. Barry Schwartz demonstrated that an overabundance of choice doesn’t liberate—it paralyzes.² The same dynamic applies to information. Beyond a certain threshold, additional input doesn’t sharpen judgment. It fragments it.
Michael Hyatt writes about this tension in Free to Focus: leaders who chase comprehensiveness often sacrifice clarity.³ They know more, but decide worse. They gather endlessly, but act late. They confuse thoroughness with wisdom.
George Hurst understood this instinctively. He didn’t need me to control every detail. He needed me to trust the musicians—and trust myself to lead without micromanaging every measure.
The same applies now: you don’t need more information to make better decisions. You need less noise so the signal can surface.
Clarity doesn’t come from addition. It comes from subtraction.
Principle 3: Choose One Channel to Silence for Seven Days
This is where principle becomes practice.
Not a grand overhaul. Not a digital detox. Not a pledge to “be more mindful.”
Just one source. One stream of input. One channel that multiplies without meaning.
Maybe it’s the news app you check reflexively. Maybe it’s the social media feed that leaves you irritated. Maybe it’s the newsletter you signed up for three years ago that no longer serves you but still demands your attention every morning.
Pick one. Mute it. Not forever—just for seven days.
Here’s what you’ll notice: the absence won’t create a gap. It will create space. And in that space, you’ll hear something you’ve been missing—your own thinking.
Timothy Keller writes in Every Good Endeavor that work requires both action and reflection, and that reflection requires silence.⁴ Not passive silence. Intentional silence. The kind that refuses to fill every moment with input.
That’s what this principle protects: the conditions under which discernment can form.
You won’t solve every problem in seven days. But you will notice what happens when one stream of noise stops flowing. And that noticing is enough to begin with.
George Hurst didn’t just teach me to conduct that day. He taught me to trust what I already knew—and to stop drowning it out with frantic effort.
The same lesson applies now.
You already know more than you think. You already carry the discernment you need. But you can’t hear it over the noise.
So choose one source to silence. Not because it’s evil. Not because it’s wrong. But because it’s crowding out something more important: the clarity that’s already there, waiting for you to stop and listen.
Takeaway Action: This week, identify one source of mental noise—a news feed, a social platform, a habitual scroll—and mute it for seven days. Notice what emerges in the space it leaves behind.
If this resonated with you, The Maestro’s Dispatch arrives each week with fresh insight on leadership, clarity, and joyful excellence. Subscribe here to join the conversation.
Endnotes
- Cal Newport, Digital Minimalism: Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World (New York: Portfolio, 2019), 28–34.
- Barry Schwartz, The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less (New York: Ecco, 2004), 2–9.
- Michael Hyatt, Free to Focus: A Total Productivity System to Achieve More by Doing Less (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2019), 87–92.
- Timothy Keller, Every Good Endeavor: Connecting Your Work to God’s Work (New York: Penguin Books, 2012), 243.